Electric Review

Culture & Criticism From the Far Distant Realms

Listening For What Matters

LISTENING FOR WHAT MATTERS: Avoiding Contextual Errors in Health Care. Saul J. Weiner. Alan Schwartz. Oxford University Press.

Listening For What Matters

Image courtesy of Oxford University Press.

In today’s health-care-obsessed culture, Listening For What Matters is an absolute must read. Written by medical doctors Saul Weiner and Alan Schwartz (University of Illinois at Chicago), the treatise states in no uncertain terms that there is one prerequisite necessary for a successful doctor-patient relationship: communication. And while it is ultimately up to the patient to ask the right questions and clearly state why they’ve come seeking medical care, there is concomitant responsibility on the doctor to completely and accurately digest what is being said.

Unfortunately, far too many doctors are bad listeners, jumping in leaps and bounds to the diagnosis and treatment plan before they’ve gathered the material facts and conducted a proper patient interview. In one of the more illuminating passages of Listening For What Matters, the authors recant an exchange where a patient told their doctor they were no longer taking their pills because they’d lost their job and couldn’t afford them, to which the doctor replied: “Sorry to hear that, do you have any allergies?” In another compelling passage, the authors outline a case study in which a doctor ordered more insulin for a patient’s worsening diabetes, neglecting to discover that the patient’s failing eyes were affecting their ability to read the dosing lines on the syringe.

The lesson here is that a physician’s failure to obtain the right information in the right context can bring about fatal consequences. Obviously, doctors are pushed to the limit by their workload as they try to see as many patients as possible to offset shrinking revenue streams and smaller payments from insurance companies. Additionally, many doctors suffer from greatly inflated egos that make them think that they’ve seen just this kind of case a thousand times already, a trap that tempts them to turn off their ears and opt for ‘one size fits all’ treatment plans.

In light of these challenges, Weiner and Schwartz advocate that medical providers come to practice contextualized care – imploring that doctors view each patient as a person with a unique life context and not just a series of medical issues. To this end, the authors have created a system to assess the medical provider’s response to “contextual clues” called “4C” (“Content Coding for the Contextualization of Care”). In sum, this system extends the scientific method all the way to the exam-room interview: Forcing the doctor into a real-time dialogue with the patient, requiring that he listen to every response and then build additional questions based on those responses as the pair move in tandem toward the right diagnosis.

Listening For What Matters (based on a decade of research that saw both actors and actual patients carry hidden audio-recording devices to doctor visits) is truly a unique and important book with a broad-brush reach: Consumers should read it to learn how to better communicate with their healthcare providers, while doctors should immediately review the Weiner-Schwartz “4C” guide-posts to learn how to hear what their patients just said.

by John Aiello

Advertisements

One comment on “Listening For What Matters

  1. Pingback: Electric Review on Listening for What Matters | Contextualizing Care

Talk to Rat:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 26, 2016 by in 2016, In the Spotlight, January 2016, Rat On Fiction & Nonfiction and tagged , , , .
In accordance with FTC Guidelines on blogging and product reviews, The Electric Review discloses that the books, records, DVDS and other products reviewed are submitted to us by publishers, record labels, publicity firms, artists, manufacturers and creators free of charge. The Electric Review further states that these entities and individuals submit materials to us of their own volition and understand that the submission of material is for discretionary consideration by the Editor and is not to be construed as to be in ‘exchange’ for a review.
The Electric Review does not serve as a ‘for-hire’ advertising vehicle and the submission of material for review creates no agreement either express or implicit requiring us to provide comment on a book, record, film, product or event. In sum, The Electric Review accepts no payment for the publication of a review. Instead, commentary is published as a free public service with reviews based solely on merit and the lasting classroom or cultural value of a given work: this compendium of essays meant to serve as an electronic library and on-going teaching resource surveying the 21st-century landscape.
Website copyright: John Aiello & The Electric Review. All rights reserved.
Violations of this notice are subject to sanction under United States Code: Title 17.
Reproduction of material from any Electric Review pages without the written permission of John Aiello or the named author is strictly prohibited.
%d bloggers like this: